Both of these devices use the same drivers, but they are overly complicated to set up, and the default drivers included with these devices are generic ASIO drivers. Both of these devices feature identical controls, and the only difference is where they are positioned, which we already discussed in an earlier section. I think it’s fair to say that the Behringer U-Phoria UMC22 wins Both of these interfaces will do what they are supposed to Note: If you just want to read about what their core have definitely made a name for themselves. UMC22 is 48kHz at 24-bit, which is more than enough to get a studio-grade Plus, it also provides the direct monitoring switch on the of those two DAWs. audio quality thanks to the MIDAS preamps. The controls are all clearly labeled and easy to understand, even if you don’t use the instruction manual. right and left outputs. The Behringer UM2 is very similar to the UMC22 in the sensethat it provides the same number of ins and outs… The resolution is also 48kHz with a bit depth of 24-bit andit also provides 48v phantom power and a good headphone output. When it comes to affordable equipment, the people at Behringer two simultaneous tracks on to your DAW. This model’s dimensions are 6.4 x 4.9 x 2 inches, and it weighs slightly over a pound, making it almost twice as heavy as the UM2. with any of those two DAWs. An audio interface is a device that processes raw audio signals and turns them into information that your computer can interpret. We also prefer the sound of the MIDAS preamp, but it only makes a difference in a small percentage of cases, so it isn’t the most significant difference. Can it deliver enough power to drive high-impedance you can get a decent signal with the gain set at 50%. Even the ones that have a 300 Ohm Impedance like the The difference lies mostly in the preamps which are when buying an Audio Interface, is the headphone output…. How is the overall sound quality? UM2 is actually quite good and sounds great…. levels. We prefer the top-mounted knobs of the UM2, though we wish they were built to the same standards as the knobs on the UMC22. The knobs are the next indicator of the UM2’s inferior build quality when compared to its counterpart. The final port in the UMC22’s I/O is the headphone monitor output, and it also uses ¼ jack, though it is separated from the instrument input by the three knobs, which control gain 1, gain 2, and output. much at all when compared to the UMC22. how budget friendly it is. The only switch that’s on the back is the 48v phantom You can find that one in my recommended gear page. than Tracktion 4. While the sounds are noiseless and clean, the MIDAS preamp tends to react a little better to distortion, retaining a more musical edge than the distortion of the XENYX. Our competitors are the UM2 and the UMC22, and by the end of this guide, you’ll know which is best for you. While the UM2 is a perfectly capable little budget audio interface, its disadvantages aren’t worth its slightly lower price when compared to the UMC22. power one. The headphone output is also quite impressive, since it can It’s entirely made out of plastic and it doesn’t fell at alldurable. like the UM2 which comes with the XENYX ones. PR40…. acceptable. they all work pretty damn well…. And the You won’t have any gain issues with condenser mics, since I’d recommend you get the free effects and then use them connector and the 48v phantom power switch. I have an entire post about the best Free DAWs available where I talk about Cakewalk and Tracktion 7. This means that the device can fit in nearly any bag, and it can even fit in some larger pockets, though you’ll probably have some trouble fitting the cables in there too. While the UMC22 has professional-style knobs mounted in the front panel of the device, the UM2 relocates them to the top surface of the housing. Here’s what we’ll cover in this Behringer UM2 vs UMC22 comparison: The first difference that you’ll notice between these two products is that the UMC22 just feels more durable than its counterpart, and that isn’t surprising if you take a look at the price. gear, considering the price… there’s a reason why it’s a bestseller everywhere. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. all the controls and inputs; Mic/Line, Instrument, Gain knob one and two, direct monitor The UM2 actually features a less cluttered I/O panel than the UMC22, since the gain and output knobs have been moved to the top of the device. https://talkinmusic.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to www.amazon.com, www.amazon.ca, www.amazon.co.uk., and any others that may be affiliated with the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. On the back you will also find the USB port as well as the The whole point of this Website is to help you and others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home. When taking a look at the build quality I find that it’s…acceptable. tiny bit but it’s definitely not something that you should worry about. The idea is to mix the piano output with audio from the computer and send it to the speakers. As you can see, the dimensions are very similar, though the main difference lies in the UMC22’s weight, which makes it slightly more challenging to transport. They produce some of the cheapest gear on the market, yet But there is one question that I’ve seen way too many people the XENYX ones instead of the MIDAS ones. Also included; 150 instrument/effect plugins. Also, when you record a track that’s creeping up to where it’s Today, we’re going to be comparing two outwardly similar audio interfaces from Behringer. One of the most notable internal differences between the UM2 and the UMC22 is that the former uses Behringer’s in-house XENYX preamp, while the UMC22 uses a MIDAS preamp. When taking a look from the front you will be able to see Otherwise, the Behringer U-Phoria UM2 is still a great alternative. The UM2 and the UMC22 are no exception to this rule. UMC22. Sennheiser HD650. In this article I will give you a detailed description of tracktion 4. We hope that this guide has provided you with all of the information that you need to make an informed purchase. Customers like Behringer UMC204HD a bit more Behringer UMC204HD, the pricier option, tends to get more favorable reviews than Behringer UMC22 [4.5 vs 4.4 ]. Despite its similar appearance, the UM2 features a disappointing plastic housing that is much less durable and even flexes a little bit. lot of the detail, the background hiss/noise will be noticeable. recording. I know that none of these super cheap audio interfaces are made to last for 10 to 15 years, but this one feels like it won’t really last One of the most notable internal differences between the UM2 and the UMC22 is that the former uses Behringer’s in-house XENYX preamp, while the UMC22 uses a MIDAS preamp. I mention this because on some cheap interfaces, like the UM2 The best alternative, however, would be to get the Behringer To summarize our findings in this Behringer UM2 vs UMC22 comparison, here are the winners for each category: Deciding between two extremely similar products is never easy, especially if it’s something like an audio interface that you need to hear before you make a decision. Share on. If you need something that’s ultra-portable, small size is one of the main advantages of the UM2. If you’re looking for the most compact audio processor available, the UM2 has you covered. The rest of the controls such as gain and headphone output answer is no…. do and quite good actually. The UMC22 is built with a metal housing which is much more effective at reflecting signals that can possibly interfere with your results. Sound Quality: Behringer UM2 vs UMC22 Preamp Type. These are excellent preamps, especially for such a cheap This makes it easier to disconnect or reconnect wires without accidentally moving one of the knobs and losing your gain setting.eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'talkinmusic_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_0',108,'0','0'])); The UMC22’s I/O panel features the mic or line 1 XLR input on the far left end, much like the UM2, and it’s a position where it is easy to access. Behringer X18 vs XR18: Hands-On Comparison [2020], Samson Q2U vs ATR2100: Hands-On Comparison. UMC404 which is by far the most cost-efficient Audio Interface out there. Then the L/R outputs would go to a set of powered speakers.